Monday 27 August 2012

Ghosts; the answer

In this modern age of mobile phones with cameras, and cameras, and cameras with phones with cameras and netbooks with cameras and fruit and vegetables with cameras, why is it that there are not a plethora of believable ghost imagery? OK, there are dozens of orb pics and photo-shoppped images and ancient double exposure nonsense, BUT, and this is a massive but, no really good photos of ghosts as described by their witnesses.

Why? OK, the sceptics will say that there are no ghosts, it's all bollocks, BUT, almost everyone, everyone, either has a story of an encounter themselves OR they have a second hand story of an encounter. Why is this the case? Obviously, there has been a situation, an event but as nothing has been  photographed does this mean that it can be dismissed? Absolutely not. In as much the same way as sceptics dismiss homeopaths as rubbish they are quick to use the placebo effects as the means to explain this, yet, the placebo effect itself cannot be explained. Obviously something is being experienced, sightings, sounds, aromas, but there is no proof. My answer is as follows:

Many, many external stimuli can excite and create the necessary behaviour within the brain in order to exhibit alien experiences. No-one refutes how ecstasy or LCD can cause hallucinations and bizarre effects. Natural events: fluctuations in the natural magnetic fields of the area for example can cause hallucinations. Dietary combinations can also, stress can and so can suggestion.

My conclusion is that paranormal encounters DO occur (only in as much as they are beyond explanations at this point in time) but they are caused by real events.

Tomorrow, the truth on the afterlife (the truth as it cannot be dis-proved ;-)

No comments:

Post a Comment