Wednesday 10 October 2012

Jimmy Savile, pedo, surprised?

If the press are correct we need to remember the following difference:


Pedo-File
PDF File















I believe that it is such a misunderstanding, or similar, that led to the BBC ignoring allegations for decades regarding the predatory and consistent sexual abuse taking place on their premises. If not then what could the reason possibly be that absolutely nothing was done? It must have been fifteen years ago, or even more, when, in a pub somewhere, I remember having a discussion about Jimmy Savile and his sexual proclivities. It must, therefore have been, perhaps not wholly in the public domain, but well enough known that blokes in pubs had heard the rumours and discussed the same at length. I find it inconceivable that the BBC or indeed and organisation retaining the services of this freak would not have at least heard rumours let alone received complaints. The matter is compounded by additional allegations against other well known entertainers in company with Savile who seemed to happily engage in similar activities with underage girls. Personally I cannot accept the proclaimed ignorance, and hence, innocence of the BBC, even if it were true, leaving a trio of underage girls in the company of a group of creepy, leering celebs of the period cannot be a sensible thing to do.

Who knows where this will lead and how deep the rabbit hole goes, if too far then I fear a greater cover-up is on the cards. The greatest potential scandal is of a seventies sub-culture of rape and child abuse with celebrities of the time protected by agents and producers.

How much will be uncovered?

Time will tell.

No comments:

Post a Comment